#Projectlibre vs officelibre pdf#
#Projectlibre vs officelibre for android#
#Projectlibre vs officelibre code#

#Projectlibre vs officelibre pdf#

PDF support is available with LibreOffice, with OpenOffice it is also available with a free plugin. LibreOffice supports Office Open XML (OOXML) export, which means you can save any file in Microsoft format (.docx.

However, some features can be a show stopper for advanced users or those who want to get more out of this program. :)įor an average user, there aren’t any major differences. :) Yes, I know this is my subjective opinion, but just look at the facts. LibreOffice is better in each and every part. As you can see, there are many more improvements and bug fixes in the latter.

#Projectlibre vs officelibre for android#

LibreOffice looks ahead, planning versions for Android (they just released a beta!), online versions, adding more architectures while OpenOffice stays still and stagnates.Ĭompare the release notes of OpenOffice versions and LibreOffice versions. They also have extensive user guides for all the applications inside the suite. And every change that happens is documented on LibreOffice's wiki. You can ask whatever you want at, r/libreoffice or even in one of the mailing lists and (usually) get a quick answer. LibreOffice has a larger community and better documentation. I can't remember, in the last three years, any organisation / goverment with validity adopting Apache OpenOffice (correct me if I'm wrong). Many govermental institutions use it (such as the city of Munich, which is also a contributor). LibreOffice is preferred by more organisations. Calc can use the GPU for calculations, the whole suite does not load 14,000 lines on every startup, the import of ODS and XLSX files is quicker and many many more. xlsx, pptx, which IIRC OpenOffice only imports.īecause of the Coverity fixes, the constant refactoring, the various contributors, LibreOffice has many performance improvements.

LibreOffice has improved significantly the import of Microsoft Office documents. LibreOffice has started since 2010 a constant refactoring of the code, some of which dates to the nineties, allowing the project to add more features easily and overcome technical barriers.

#Projectlibre vs officelibre code#

On the contrary, OpenOffice has a Coverity score of 94 bugs / 100,000 lines of code (~10,500 unfixed bugs). Fixing these bugs reduces unexpected behaviors (therefore improving stability) while the program is running. LibreOffice has corrected all the defects found by Coverity, an automatic 'bug finder'. OpenOffice has only a meager number of IBM developers (I'm not sure if they still continue contributing). (adding security to the project, because if one company stops development, others will continue support). LibreOffice is also developed by developers from a large number of commercial companies, such as Red Hat, Collabora, Canonical etc. LibreOffice commit log, OpenOffice commit log. LibreOffice has much more contributions than OpenOffice. This means that all improvements made in OpenOffice are available in LibreOffice but improvements made in LibreOffice are not available in OpenOffice.

LibreOffice can reuse code from OpenOffice, while the opposite can't happen. Most of the existing OOo developers jumped ship to LibreOffice, considering it the true continuation of OOo instead of Oracle OpenOffice, which was later donated to the Apache Foundation, becoming Apache OpenOffice. When Oracle bought Sun and threatened the existence of the office suite, a community fork was created called LibreOffice. Historical note: Until 2010 there was only one suite, (OOo) developed by Sun.